Sports have changed in so many ways over the 140 or so years that
professional sports have existed. Back in those, players were bought and sold
for sacks of food, but in the present, every year in world soccer the transfer
fee record has a chance to be broken, which was broken this past summer by
Manchester United (England) signing the French midfielder Paul Pogba from
Juventes (Italy) for £89m roughly $115.5m. Source: Sky Sports.
While the big
money clubs spend every penny possible to get the best players to create the
best possible team. Low budget clubs have to keep up with the big boys by using
extensive scouting to find potential good players on economic deals. Since all
there transfer deals are usually big gambles for the club, the best hope for
the club is that one player every year breaks through and is worth more than
what they had paid for. A great example of this would be the transfer of Robin
Van Persie to Arsenal (England) from Feyenoord (Netherlands) for £2.75m
($4.17m). It's fair to say he was more than worth that fee scoring 96 goals in
194 games during his 8 year tenure with the club. Source: The Telegraph. But on the other hand when too many
transfers are not successful and a club spend too much money it could lead to
the club's worst nightmare, relegation.
Getting relegated
from the top division to the second tier, or even second to third, third to
fourth, etc: isn't necessarily the end of the world for a club. Usually after
getting demoted from a higher division, other teams that remained in the higher
division or newly promoted teams will go after that demoted team's best players
to create some extra revenue for the club. Then there are some options what a
club can do with that revenue.
Option one would
trying invest that money into a few players that could be an immediate impact
but in the long term by the time the club reaches the top division again those
players may not good enough or young enough to compete at the top level. That's
the crazy thing about sports and being a paid athlete, their careers truly
start around age 20 but by the time they're 35 years old they may not be
physically good enough, they could lose their speed or their strength to keep
up with the new young guns.
The second option
for a demoted team with money would be to invest into their own academy. For
those who don't what an academy is in world soccer let me briefly describe it.
The academy is the soccer version of minor league baseball or the developmental
league in basketball. It is a lower level team usually made up players from age
18-22, similar to collegiate athletics but the major difference between an
academy and all the other examples I listed is that clubs may sign players at
any age. Usually the kids are separated into different age groups for competition,
but no matter what nationality or age any young kid could sign for any club,
Lionel Messi arguably the greatest player of all time but never played
professionally in his home country of Argentina because at the age of 13 years
old the Spanish giant Barcelona FC signed Messi to their academy. Back to the
positives of investing into an academy. It is by far cheaper to build an
academy because of kid’s low wages, regularly getting pay raises as they get
older and move closer to the professional squad. Also there is no transfer fee
to pay to another club because the young kid isn't owned by any club yet. But
there is less guarantee that these academy player will be successful pros.
At the end of it
all both options have their positives and negatives. No matter the size of the
club big, medium, small every club has an academy for the future plans and
every club will purchase players for the present. When you're a small club and
those cheap potential good players end up working out to be good and your
academy produces enough good players then your small club can have a magical
season like Leicester City had last season defying their 5000-1 odds to win the
English Premier League.
No comments:
Post a Comment